Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ServerPronto

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 January 20.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Icewedge (talk) 00:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ServerPronto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no coverage of this server company outside press releases. Not notable. (contested prod, no reason given) Fences&Windows 18:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Panama-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 18:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 18:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 19:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it's spam masquerading as an article. No significant independent references given and no found. Author is single-issue and works for the company. Haakon (talk) 19:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The trade sites cited as "references" are in fact blog-like[1], appear to regurgitate trivial press releases uncritically,[2], and just don't have the kind of readership needed to sustain a business as an encyclopedia subject.[3] It's too easy now for spammers to tart up their promotional pages with "references" of this sort. Hate to sound like a broken record, but until we require familiar and mainstream sources for tech businesses and their products, we're leaving our rear flank exposed. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with the above, and there's nothing really encyclopedic in the article, I think the most encyclopedic part of the article mentions where the data centers are! The word "dedicated" is mentioned 2 or 3 times on the page and being such a short article makes me think this is just spam disguised as an article. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete - Article is objective as possible for a corporate brand, and consistent in content to other brands in this space such as ServerBeach and The Planet Internet Services. Do agree that article needs more references.--Prieur3 (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete - Company is notable in it's industry due to length of time in operation and number of customers. - psostre (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.