Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seldon Hunt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seldon Hunt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CREATIVE. article lacks reliable sources. most of gnews hits [1] are passing mentions. only the first article [2] has some mention but he is mentioned among many artists. don't see significant indepth coverage of this individual. LibStar (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 20:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep have subsequent to the intial listing provided a wide range of references (including a number of interviews with Hunt). Any search will come up with substantial 'hits' so I can only conclude that the nominator did not undertake sufficient research before nominating the article. Dan arndt (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Dan arndt (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep self evident - nomination should be withdrawn Satu Suro 10:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.