Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SegReg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SegReg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related page:

CumFreq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Fails WP:NSOFT. There are a passing mentions in academic of the software being used, but that doesn't constitute notability under the inclusion criteria. There is also very likely a COI and self-promotion issue here. All of Asitgoes (talk · contribs) page creations are are about software hosted on http://www.waterlog.info , a lot of which were AfC drafts failed for notability. All references on SegReg are to http://www.waterlog.info . When SegReg was tagged for notability, Asitgoes removed it himself and threw a wall of text up on the talk page about how the software was clearly notable. Apocheir (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per general notability, WP:SPS, and WP:ABOUTSELF, but OP beware that WP:NSOFT is an essay and not a policy. x2step (lets talk 💌) 22:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:notability, reads like an advert or manual. Bruhpedia (talk) 00:42, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]