Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seema Midha (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seema Midha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet WP:NBIO. Also relevant is WP:NFRINGE: if it has been referenced extensively, and in a serious and reliable manner, by major publications that are independent of their promulgators and popularizers. Was previously deleted in 2014 as a result of an AfD. —Paleo Neonate – 06:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Paleo Neonate – 06:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Paleo Neonate – 06:54, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —Paleo Neonate – 06:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. —Paleo Neonate – 06:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete nn.~!Dlohcierekim (talk)
Delete - I don't see that much has changed since the previous AFD... advertising supported by iffy sources. Blueboar (talk) 10:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete FAIL WP:BIO Samat lib (talk) 11:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being the author of the first book on mobile number prediction does not establish notability for it's author. Mduvekot (talk) 16:16, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 19:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closer - If deleted, this redirect would also become orphan: Seema Midha (Tarot Reader). Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 00:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.