Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seema Midha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 04:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seema Midha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All self-citations/primary sources in which she is the author. Her work has been reported in a cursory manner, but she has not been discussed in depth at all. The awards on her seem to be incredibly minor/not significant enough to pass WP:GNG. NativeForeigner ^Talk 03:52, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Balatant advertisement for a tarot reader/alternative healer who's various awards turn out to be either obscure or dubious. For example, the "women entrepreneurship award" turns out to one of many given out at a local nonprofit group's dinner. There's no record of any "national journalist award", her name is merely one of the metatags on that url. Generic honors like "Honour of excellence" and "Super achiever Award" cited to nothing aren't helpful in building confidence that this person is truly notable. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and LuckyLouie. I used the google search string "seema midha" (Tarot OR numerology OR Reiki OR Hypnosis) in my browser bar, checked out 8 SERP pages, did not find anything worthwhile. Doesn't meet the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.