Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scribefire
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. henrik•talk 20:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Scribefire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:Notability (web) and too short. All references, I have searched, are in some blogs, that are not reliable sources. Also there is only links to the official site and source code in the article. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 19:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't find any reliable sources which would establish this as being more notable than every other Firefox extension that exists. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.