Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screenfetch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Screenfetch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG - non notable software TheMagikCow (T) (C) 10:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 13:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Screenfetch is a popular tool for sharing screenshots of Linux desktops. Articles covering screenfetch include [1] [2] [3] [4]. Microsoft even featured it on their Linux on Windows demonstration. [5] Also the Spanish Wikipedia has a longer article and more references. Henry (talk) 15:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –XboxGamer22408^talk 18:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Henry. –XboxGamer22408^talk 18:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of those refs aren't reliable, secondary sources. Is there really no list of Linux tools/terminal scripts that can house the few sentences of coverage this warrants? czar 17:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.