Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - merge. (Merger isn't specifically mentioned at Wikipedia:Speedy keep, but I believe this is fine since the page is now just a lowly redirect.) (non-admin closure)‎ — W.andrea (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A word no one uses today that has no notability; the article isn't saying anything other than an example of the statement that Middle English doesn't have the same word as Modern English. Georgia guy (talk) 18:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I started a merge proposal into She (pronoun) § History while this AfD was being created. However, the fact that it's uncited is a problem. — W.andrea (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I found a citation, but it's a dictionary, which isn't sufficient to establish notability. — W.andrea (talk) 18:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge done. I would have done it sooner but I didn't understand the target page (She (pronoun) § History). I just figured it out and moved the important content from Sche and converted it to a redirect. — W.andrea (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.