Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satguru Jagjit Singh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G12 copyright violation. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Satguru Jagjit Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Jagjit Singh already exists. This is a duplicate. SH 17:33, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - article Jagjit Singh is not about the religious personality. Nor are any of the people listed at Jagjit Singh (disambiguation). Ratzd'mishukribo (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It also seems like a mass copy from a site. SH 22:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under G12. Every word is copy-pased from this site. It doesn't meet the WP:GNG or WP:BIO, but that's neither here nor there because the site from which it's copied wholesale asserts a copyright and there's no assertion of permission, etc. in the article. --Batard0 (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I've tagged this for speedy and notified the author. --Batard0 (talk) 16:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.