Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarwar Javaid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarwar Javaid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent evidence (on Google search) of notability, only the usual vanity hits. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I had a search earlier, and found absolutely nothing to show notability either. Mabalu (talk) 00:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG. South Nashua (talk) 17:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG.No references.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. No sourcing is evident for his priority claim, even if it could also pass WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence at all of notability. OtterAM (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.