Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarmatism (pseudohistory)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sarmatism (pseudohistory)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing this AfD for an IP editor who tried blanking the article and then struggled creating AfD. They wrote this on the talk page of this AfD: The sources do not correspond to content. The author tried to create a concept out of nothing, it is telling the entry failed to pass on Lithuanian Wikipedia itself. It is clearly an unencyclopedic entry of no relevance, breaking WP. Renata•3 01:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article does suffer from a heavy case of WP:OR. Renata•3 02:19, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It does look like much of the content is original research. I also find that indeed "the sources do not correspond to content." Google search yields some results which are from self-published sites, not enough to prove significant coverage and notability; and some links do not open. Prof.PMarini (talk) 00:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the reason we have WP:FRINGE is to keep out pages that are a work-around of WP:OR. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.