Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samrat Raichand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sock puppetry is not allowed. Thus all the sock votes have been discarded Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samrat Raichand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Continually recreated article about a person who does not meet the General Notability Guideline or WP:NACTOR. Deleted at least 3 times in the past. Exemplo347 (talk) 16:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Delete Although the subject has acted in very well known movies, which had significant success at the box office, the roles in these movies have been insignificant. Fails GNG/NACTOR. Lourdes 16:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject of the article is not notable and the article lacks significant information. Bmbaker88 (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, subject fails GNG and WP:NACTOR as he has had no significant roles in movies/TV shows. — Quasar G. 15:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the subject has acted in very well known movies, which had significant success at the box office, don't go to the past that how many times it's deleted just see there is cite and sources enough to make him notable. AfD must close. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sriramvats (talk • contribs) 04:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Sriramvats (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

~~Keep, kindly go through the sources their on Reference and google his name for your reference - - Sriramvats (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)~~[reply]

Delete -- the subject's 'notable' roles are "Cameo" and "Soldier". Hardly significant. This is WP:TOOSOON. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- the subject captured around 5mis scene. After watching movie I'm commenting on discussion page, he is very important part of that movie and collected claps of audience too. Article is significant and must remove from AfD. - - Shirajmz (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC) Note to closing admin: Shirajmz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Please note Using multiple accounts to contribute to AfD discussions can lead to the loss of editing privileges. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kindly Suggest--Nominator its advice you to don't look at past that how many times article has been deleted, just understand the notability and for more reference watch movie. Just finally remove AfD and Let this discussion closed here. M97S (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@M97S: My final word is no, I will not be withdrawing my nomination. Please do not attempt to close the discussion yourself. Exemplo347 (talk) 19:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Exemplo347: you first search the subject on google then say you decision. Reference is added which verify the cite and sources of subject. Kindly close the discussion and remove AfD. Otherwise I'll make other user will consider you as negative person M97S (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the notability criteria for actors. --bonadea contributions talk 19:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article is very significant and imdb also proves that he's very known actor. Bonadea is without confirming saying this all. Think before you say M97S (talk) 20:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC) — M97S (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Note Did I not point out that using multiple accounts is not allowed? Anyway, I checked through Google and carried out other searches (following the process listed here - WP:BEFORE) before I started this discussion. The notability guidelines are quite clear. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Checkuser note: M97S, Shirajmz, and Sriramvats are Confirmed socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SamratBornToPlay.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.