Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samanta Sarmin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Samanta Sarmin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NPOLITICIAN 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, and Bangladesh. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 11:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. The article doesn't show significant coverage per WP:GNG, and most of the sources are just routine news coverage. ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 13:16, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Should never have left draft. Deb (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This stub does not speak for itself and does not have enough information to show why the subject is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unelected spokespersons for political parties aren't automatically notable under WP:NPOL, but this is based principally on sources in which she's being the spokesperson rather than sources in which her work in the role is being reported upon analytically. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL with what we have been able to find. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:03, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is a distracting clutter of references which don't do much to establish notability, but This shows how prominent she is. We certainly shouldn't delete without canvassing Bengali sources. WP has systematic bias against Bangladesh: it's a country twice the size of the UK, but according to Humaniki has around 1/25th of the number of biographies. Dsp13 (talk) 11:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No need to delete this page because there is enough information with references. but one thing I suggest is to change person name to Samantha Sharmin as it is the correct spelling please move this page. Thanks Marxsafe (talk) 13:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. If the best source we have is the one shared by Dsp13 about her chairing a search committee than we really are scraping the barrel here for sources. That is a non-notable because it is WP:PRIMARY not WP:SECONDARY as it is qualitative contemporary reporting with no distance from the event, and is principally an interview. Not to mention chairing a search committee isn't particularly notable of an achievement. 4meter4 (talk) 01:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.