Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajid Mahmood Bhatti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sajid Mahmood Bhatti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:BLPPROD. Subject of article appears to be a political party worker in Gujar Khan, Pakistan. No mentions in Pakistani English language newspapers; no mentions in a GNews search in Urdu. Article fails a number of tests for notability, specifically but not limited to WP:POLITICIAN and WP:ANYBIO. (Article also appears to be an autobiography, but this is not a reason for deletion.) Shirt58 (talk) 10:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete You can't contest BLP-Prods, you can only source them. I find no evidence of passing any kind of notability on a quick G-search, and the article is so promotional that it should be deleted anyhow. Ray^Talk 18:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless it can be sourced. Also, the ip and new user inserted the info in the articles it links to as well. Ryan Norton 23:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject's own work does not constitute a reliable source and thus without those, it ends up failing WP:Notability (people). MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.