Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sackboy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. Moved to User:Rafevl/Sackboy (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sackboy

Article does not yet meet guidelines on notablility or verifiability. Suggest userfying the article to User:Rafevl/Sackboy (as the main contributor) until it meets the criteria for inclusion in main Wiki. Then redirect Sackboy back to LittleBigPlanet. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 09:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. X201 (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy – I pretty much agree with the nom's assessment. Put it into the userspace, inform the user of reliable sources, verifiability, and no original research. MuZemike 16:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY and it's generally poorly written.--Megaman en m (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User page - As per nom. As per previously mentioned reasons. Obviously a new user so suggest a personal note explaining reasons for removal and pointing them towards WP:VG as a place for help and advice. I think there is enough out of universe info out in the World to support a Sackboy article, he is starting to become a Sony mascot, especially for SCEE. - X201 (talk) 18:41, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy - Like said above, inform the user that there is hope for the article. --Blake (talk) 18:52, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for sure; userfy if you wish but still press the delete button on this page (or the redirect that results after the move). Don't give the creator false hope that this article would have been acceptable with only minor changes; explain to them WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:WAF, and so on. Savidan 17:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.