Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWTBot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SWTBot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any third-party WP:RSes for the subject. Most references are to user forums discussing it. I would expect that notable coverage would be present in such cases. Prod was removed stated "A Google Books search turns up several sources", however those are mentions in books, not extensive coverage. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not a notable subject as evidenced by the lack of available, independent sources. I'm sure that there are many developers that know all about SWTBot, but unfortunately, it does not meet our inclusion standards. As a side note, editors who create these types of article should try to inform readers and not simple provide a definition-like summary and external links elsewhere. - Mr X 02:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage in reliable sources found; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Gong show 08:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No non-primary sources to indicate notability yet DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.