Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STOPzilla (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 11:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STOPzilla

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like an advertisement, very little references and hardly referenced. Very little information anywhere except under Reviews. Ana r chyte 11:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I guess not notable or worse.. Note, I've edited this page to keep stuff out.. and tried to get some WP:PRIMARY source stuff in that seemed very dubious. comp.arch (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing to suggest better at this time. Notifying past AfD commenter Jarkeld. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has run its course. Nothing new to improve it with. Time to go. Jarkeld (talk) 11:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.