Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STL Interactive
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 19:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- STL Interactive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be a notable studio. None of the games have articles, and there is not substantial third-party coverage. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:34, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - software company article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant RS coverage (though there is apparently a St. Louis tech event that uses this name).Dialectric (talk) 08:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Facebook and twitter are best available sources. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.