Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSF (emulator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SSF (emulator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was redirected to List of video game emulators a few weeks ago, and the redirect was reverted today by an IP editor who gave no reason or edit summary. As an emulator, it has failed to receive coverage in reliable sources and fails to meet the general notability guideline. A Google search turned up only a few fan sites for it, but nothing to indicate any coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 16:38, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not passing WP:GNG with in-depth reliable sources. I see primary and non-in-depth ones only. Here's a non-affiliated review, but non-reliable source. Beyond that, it's all tutorials and listing/directory entries. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator is right. This article does not establish its notability. The article only introduces a RacketBoy review (RacketBoy? I hope it's not a boy that engages in racketeering) but that's far from significant coverage. So, deleting, merging or magically fixing notability? Whichever sails your boat. Fleet Command (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.