Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMS - Superb Mini Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SMS - Superb Mini Server

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed for "Despite massive gHits, I couldn't find any book, news, or any reference which provided any more than trivial coverage." PROD was removed by initial author (and single purpose account) User:Gerasimos h with no reason stated.

User:Gerasimos h also present a conflict of interest as he appears to have a stake in software: (look at the bottom of the page) [1] [2].

Deletion nomination is for lack of notability. Odie5533 (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: one hit in Gnews, but just not notable; therefore per nom. Dewritech (talk) 18:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Massive ghits but most seem to be download sites/etc. WP:N/Per nom. Would need to be moved to Superb Mini Server anyways, yes? OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 00:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.