Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIRD Graphics Libary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied G12 by Fastily ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.slideshare.net/peterbuck/opengles-and-sgl-2d3d-graphics-accelerating-technologies#text-version). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SIRD Graphics Libary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason NuclearWizard (talk) 03:17, 28 November 2011 (UTC) This looks way too much like an advertisement. Not only that, but it really isn't in an encyclopedic format or anything. I'm not really a veteran Wikipedian, but it generally doesn't look right, and it seems very unused, unreferenced, etc.[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 November 28. Snotbot t • c » 05:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have tagged this article for speedy deletion under criterion G12 as a copyright violation of http://www.slideshare.net/peterbuck/opengles-and-sgl-2d3d-graphics-accelerating-technologies#text-version. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 05:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.