Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCRAM (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SCRAM (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally denied this AFC submission for failing WP:N and not being able to find significant coverage. The creator thanked me for my non-approval and then later accepted their own submission. SL93 (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've thanked SL93 for the review, not the non-approval, which I deem dubious. OlzhasRakhimov (talk) 21:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:PRODUCT. Coverage in reliable sources not found. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to Scram (disambiguation), where several examples of SCRAM in technology are listed. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Probably, I have misjudged and established wrong impression from Wikipedia free software articles to suggest this article. I sense my understanding of notability didn't weigh the fame as much as it seems to matter for an encyclopedia. I felt this useful knowledge would be missing for people. It's unlikely that any independent source/reference would go in depth coverage of this software because it's already done in its documentation, so only its usage for particular cases are expected to be mentioned. Anyway, I am indeed biased and not willing to improve the article as being requested. Hopefully, there will be more articles on Open-PSA, OpenReliability, and probabilistic risk analysis tools/techniques in general in future.OlzhasRakhimov (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.