Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS (Seglaw's Art Studio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAS (Seglaw's Art Studio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. A search brought up nothing more than social media coverage. I considered a speedy per A7, but I decided Afd would be safer. Pishcal — ♣ 19:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity bio, no sources other than self-generated as far as I can see. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Independent artist it seems with no significant or notable coverage (despite my multiple searches even at two Nigerian newspapers Guardian and Tribune). SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.