Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAC Vasanth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAC Vasanth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was previously deleted on 2 January 2015 and appears to be the same as the deleted version. Kges1901 (talk) 22:39, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup. The article was previously deleted per CSD A7, but I feel that the article does contain a credible claim of importance, per the subject having performed in several countries and per the awards he has received. Furthermore, the article does not qualify for deletion per CSD G4 because the previous deletion was not based upon a deletion discussion. Keep because the subject meets WP:BASIC. Source examples include [1], [2], [3]. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep -I'm seeing here a complete lack of WP:BEFORE. Subject meets WP:BIO and WP:GNG standard, -for "significant coverage they have received in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources", such as, -[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], etc.. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 03:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seeing sufficient sources to meet WP:BIO. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.