Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Round Rainbow
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Olafur Eliasson. (X! · talk) · @699 · 15:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Round Rainbow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an article about a work of art that hasn't recieved the serious, in-depth coverage that is necessitated by [WP:N]]. I'd like to avoid a redirect because the title doesn't specify that this is an article about a work of art. ThemFromSpace 20:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Olafur Eliasson. An article this short about a work of art can easily be sent over to the artist's page, who is a notable artist. I'd argue that this isn't Eliasson's most notable work and I am uncomfortable with creating articles for individual works of contemporary art, unless the work's independent importance is indisputable and sourced. This doesn't appear to be the case. freshacconci talktalk 01:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 22:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:29, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - it's clear this should be a merge. A quick look at the article shows it was written by someone unfamiliar with Wikipedia guidelines/style. Oliafur Eliasson is unquestioningly notable, and any new works should be listed on his page. (This work is not listed). Deadchildstar (talk) 23:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.