Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RotoQL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RotoQL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The individual Maxdalury is barely notable, I don't think his RotoQL venture passes WP:N; refs have passing mentions. superβεεcat 01:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I speedied this as spam, it's still promotional in tone and non-notable as per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best for now as the article is not yet better convincing. SwisterTwister talk 02:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.