Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosavia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (t) (c) 12:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rosavia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In fact, this article is not about an airline, but about a proposed measure to cope with the financial crisis in Russia, thus being highly speculative (WP:CRYSTAL). The plan was scrapped, and as its impact was very low, the whole thing does not seem to be notable for a stand-alone article. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 11:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The proposed merger was cancelled, but the article can be rewritten to include details how it was cancelled. --Anthony Ivanoff (talk) 00:45, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
very week keep. In the end of September the corporate shell of Rosavia was finally allowed to die in bankruptcy court. Its assets passed to Aeroflot-RAL. Just another stillborn child of a failed government. I'd rather reduce the article to one line in 2008–2009 Russian financial crisis, with a redirect specifically to its section on airlines, - had it been in a better shape.East of Borschov 09:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.