Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Corral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 13:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rodrigo Corral

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Withdrawn by nominator per ThatMontrealIP's advice 9H48F (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:BIO 9H48F (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 9H48F (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. 9H48F (talk) 18:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep This is the second nomination today by this editor of a highly notable graphic designer (Aaron Draplin is the other). This should just be withdrawn. It is a waste of editor time since 9H48F has failed to do their WP:BEFORE. Please read that policy. I went to Google news and immediately found this Wall Street Journal profile, this New York Times profile, this American Association of Graphic Artists profile and this National Endowment for the Arts profile. Not enough? the article contains a New Yorker profile as a source. This is basically the definition of good coverage. Please search and do WP:BEFORE before nominating other articles on notable subjects.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:13, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep May not meet WP:BIO but have significant coverage and satisfy WP:GNG obviously. --94rain ^Talk 03:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.