Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocket Internet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. There is no coherent reason given for deletion. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:34, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Internet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, while a notable company will require a rewrite to remove the advertising tone. CSD multiple times already should have been again but here we are. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Someone created a French version also.https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_InternetC E (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve - notable per WP:CORP with substantial coverage online from WP:RS. Mildly promotional tone can be fixed easily - I'll fix it myself now. If promotional content is re-added, revert, block persistent spammers, and semi-protect if necessary. Dai Pritchard (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – This article does not have a promotional tone at this time, after editing performed by another user (diff). At this time, it presents information about the company in a straightforward manner, and does not advocate for the company's services. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per my comment above, and because this is a WP:CORPDEPTH pass. Source examples include, but are not limited to: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as noted above, the promotional tone has been written out of the article.Grobertson (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable company in several countries. As suggested remove the promotional and advertising contents from the article. sami ^talk 15:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep!!! very famous company with a lot of companies around the world : Zalando in Germany, Jabong in India, Lamoda in Russia, Jumia in Africa... publicly traded http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/companyProfile?symbol=RKET.DE --WMKT fr (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.