Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robo-FTP Server (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robo-FTP Server

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted as "Non-notable software by non-notable software company." which still appears to be the case. No independent references in the article and none found. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The criteria cited appear to be applied inconsistently and unfairly. Most of the FTP Server products listed in the comparison of FTP Servers (all linking to pages for each product) seem to have been on Wikipedia for a long time with no challenge and seem to similarly lack the references/citations you are demanding. Many have no references at all or only references to their own home page. User:eks ssi —Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 🖋 11:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks sourcing, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. - MrOllie (talk) 20:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.