Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin-Mesh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Robin-Mesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I could find no coverage of this software beyond the developers' project page, trivial user-generated content, and an apparent reference here, though I don't have access to the full text to confirm. Seems to fail WP:GNG and the more specific, though non-binding, criteria in WP:NSOFT. Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have access to that article. There is a paragraph in the paper on the Robin-Mesh and why it was used for the the investigators' experiments--the open source system allowed them to instrument their router. Mark viking (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 12:29, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Commercial spam. Carrite (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.