Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta Imperatori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roberta Imperatori

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already prod'ed by Liz, with rationale Non-notable artist, moved prematurely from Draft space, fails WP:ARTIST. Given that there's a blatant cluster (Mach280, Maxxinelli01, Genefaund, and Enci.2021) editing related articles (Roberta Imperatori, Michela Ramadori, Paolo Salvati, and Cento Pittori via Margutta), I think it's a clear cut case of UPE. Vituzzu (talk) 12:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, and Italy. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Reading through the article Imperatori is referred to as both "she" and "he". I think this points to a poorly cleaned up version of a machine-translated article. Scanning the article's history, I agree that it is WP:UPE and part of the cluster of articles related to Enciclopedia d'arte italiana (nominated for deletion elsewhere). WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – arguably a copyright violation of [1], and in any event not notable. Most of the sources available do not provide her with significant coverage, and those that do are of questionable reliability and independence. Fails WP:NARTIST and the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.