Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road Tech Computer Systems Ltd
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Road Tech Computer Systems Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- This is a company selling thier product, Does not Conform to the Wiki Nobility Policy
In order to be included in Wikipedia, the company must be:
* the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself, OR * listed on ranking indices of important companies produced by well-known and independent publications, OR * used to calculate stock market indices. Being used to calculate an index that simply comprises the entire market is excluded.Chukie m (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: a software consultancy and vendor that sells a Software as a service product launched in 2006 for the analysis of tachograph data, aiding conformance to the EC Drivers Hours regulations. In English, what I think that means is that they sell software that relates to the supervision of truck drivers for regulatory compliance. If you didn't get that from the article, you have a good excuse. At any rate, such software is unlikely to be covered by sources outside of a very limited sphere of interest. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.