Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rind Snacks
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rind Snacks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failing GNG and NCORP. Sources seem largely aligned to PR/churnalism or are mentions in passing (short product intros). Available search results yield mostly routine corporate announcement or further aligned reporting. May be too soon for an independent article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that, at best, this is WP:TOOSOON. I also tried to find reliable sources on these fruit snacks, but also encountered food industry blogs, press releases and churnalism, not to mention a lot of otherwise reliable articles on the non-related pork rind snacks. Alas, there is yet nothing more. Geoff | Who, me? 20:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.