Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rickdependence Spray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep but cleanup. Sufficient sourcing has been identified Star Mississippi 02:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rickdependence Spray

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to be a notable episode of the series that would allow it to meet GNG. Unsourced, no real-world information and only consists of plot info. – DarkGlow • 17:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 17:27, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hits in Variety, Screen Rant, and a few others about how bad it was. Oaktree b (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rick and Morty (season 5)#Episodes I never like to bring in the word "cringe" into an AfD discussion, but if this wasn't a well-known series you'd think the summary/recap was written by a 12 year-old at 6:59 a.m. on their phone on a bumpy school bus before they had to give a book report at 8 a.m. And WP:ROUTINE recap articles don't really add to anything beyond it existing. Nate • (chatter) 21:29, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/draftify – The topic is certainly notable (see reviews from Variety, IndieWire, Den of Geek, and The A.V. Club), but the writing style is terrible. I think converting this to a draft for further improvement is the best call; outright deletion is not the right move if notability is established (see WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP). RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment draftify seems like an acceptable thing to do also. Oaktree b (talk) 02:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources shared by RunningTiger123 show that the episode meets WP:GNG. Cleanup is necessary, but that doesn't mean the subject isn't notable. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:43, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.