Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Thomas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 16:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom.--Deathlaser : Chat 17:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no showing of notability. and I did not find individual notability in a search. Yes, he is a "sampler" but naught much else to make this notable. He likely merits a mention in the band's article, perhaps. Collect (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – found no in-depth coverage from any reliable sources that could satisfy WP:GNG. It looks WP:TOOSOON for WP:MUSICBIO. JFHJr (㊟) 00:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.