Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alan Reid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard Alan Reid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor actor lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Best known for a upcoming role in an unreleased film. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ENT. ttonyb (talk) 15:15, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment He seems to have some minor appearances in film [1], but I can't see a keep. If kept, put in a note that this is not Richard Reid (shoe bomber), the asshole who made it more inconvenient for everyone to go through the airport. I'd add that to the extent he's mentioned on imdb.com, it's not as "Richard Alan Reid", and that he shouldn't be referred to that way here (Richard Reid (actor) would do fine). In the U.S. and Canada at least, criminals, more often than most demographic groups, tend to be referred to by their full names (Lee Harvey Oswald, John Wayne Gacy, etc.). I think is mostly to avoid any possible confusion with an innocent person. Mandsford 15:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Best known for something that has not happened yet? Yikes. His short career and lack of coverage fails TOOSOON . Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - several small roles do not pass WP:CREATIVE. Bearian (talk) 21:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.