Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Homie Quan
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 01:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rich Homie Quan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A not notable independent rapper that fails WP:BAND, nothing but trivial mentions and a google news search turns up nothing. STATic message me! 21:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The two references in the article when it was created, are both reliable sources, so he passes WP:GNG just fine. Dream Focus 23:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, two whole trivial mentions, one is just the posting of a new music video. Still does not pass WP:BAND in the slightest. STATic message me! 23:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- An interview [1] is not a trivial mention. Dream Focus 00:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, two whole trivial mentions, one is just the posting of a new music video. Still does not pass WP:BAND in the slightest. STATic message me! 23:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is clearly notable and has received a significant amount of coverage like [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Koala15 (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No doubt. 122.18.244.8 (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Meets WP:BASIC per [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sufficient sources exist to meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Here are a couple more pieces of coverage: [13][14]. Gong show 13:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per above, specifically Northamerica1000. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 16:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I wanted to note as the article creator, that I decided to create this article based on its appearance very high in WP:TOPRED, which among other things, has helped to identify areas of bias in wikipedia coverage. In the area of popular young black rap artists, we have been falling short, certainly as compared to sketchy indie bands from Brooklyn with low record sales but coverage in sites like Pitchfork. Of course I also determined that the subject appeared to also be notable before creating the article.--Milowent • hasspoken 04:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.