Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reward Gateway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reward Gateway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extensively promotional, with all the nonpromotional content being mere notices about firms acquired. DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches only found expected coverage, nothing further convincing and the currently listed sources are not closely convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
keep (although copyedit to our standards - mostly to explain just what they do) This is one of those "invisible" companies that's surprisingly large. No-one goes out in the morning thinking to do some shopping through Reward Gatweway, but a surprising number of people will do. Mostly through their government outsourcing of things like Childcare vouchers (quite a big thing in the UK). After all, it's hard for a quarter billion turnover company to not be notable. 800 pound gorillas leave big footprints. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about doing that, but I think it would need to be rewritten from scratch, in which case the current version should be deleted. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.