Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revinate
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Revinate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be based entirely on churnalism, republished press releases. Some of them are even on PR websites. This does not appear to pass WP:CORP. Guy (Help!) 06:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Sources aren't independent nor to a wide audience. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, which is pretty obvious just from the names of the websites cited Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.