Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retribution Engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retribution Engine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable video game engine. Zero coverage from reliable video game sources. Nearly 12 years since creation only one source has been added, and all it provides is download stats which is trivial. The1337gamer (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 22:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While looking for sources I didn't find any that could pass. The personal reviews that I was seeing were even saying that there have been no significant creations on this gaming engine. Fails WP:N. My search got better results with looking up Retribution gaming (or game) engine. - Pmedema (talk) 03:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of sourcing to meet the WP:GNG. Additionally, if someone were to remove all of the WP:NOTCHANGELOG entries and tech jargon, there wouldn't be much encyclopedic content left anyways. Sergecross73 msg me 16:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.