Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retighter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G3: WP:HOAX. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:31, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retighter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP is not a dictionary, bullet point definitions may work on Wiktionary, but not on Wikipedia. Mat ty.007 18:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Could find no sources for the definition of this term on Google or GScholar. The most common occurrence seems to be as a misspelling of retighten. --Mark viking (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as dictionary definition and failing verification. Peter James (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Almost certainly qualifies for A1 (no context). There's no prose here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.