Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retention

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A disambiguation page consisting of almost all WP:partial title matches, and the sole seemingly legitimate entry, Retention (news server), just refers to the standard meaning of the word in a particular situation. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Disambiguations. Skynxnex (talk) 12:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

●Speedy Keep- This page has existed since 2002, it is a required page because Retention is a general term & applies to many things, the articles listed here either include retention in the name and/or are about certain types of retention. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 15:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – there are multiple valid links here. Recall (memory), Customer retention, and Employee retention are all known simply as "retention" in some contexts. I'm not familiar with all of the other topics listed, but it's possible some of them are too. It would probably be worth cutting down the page and maybe collecting some of these topics together into broad-concept articles (it seems to me Customer retention, University student retention, and Employee retention are all special cases of the same broad concept), but there's enough to merit a disambiguation page. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 13:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in agreement with above, also "retention" is frequently used for the concept covered in the Retainage article. BobKilcoyne (talk) 17:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.