Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ResourceMiner
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- ResourceMiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notability not established, no significant media coverage, article almost untouched since 2011 Ysangkok (talk) 23:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Only ref provided is a brief article in Swedish, on its own not sufficient to establish notability. A search shows a number of download sites, but no additional significant RS coverage. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - I am unable to find sufficient evidence that this meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT. Gong show 00:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Regardless of what language the source(s) are in, the article doesn't even seem to make a claim of significance such that the decision of non-notability (which does seem to be the case) becomes an essential part of the process. --— Rhododendrites talk | 13:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.