Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reportum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article doesn't even attempt to assert notability or link to sources which do. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reportum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. Proposed deletion was declined without comment. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 20:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Adverse Event Reporting System. I don't want to make any assumptions about Johngeorgewright's motivations, but the article as written appears to be a bit of a promotional piece. I'm always nervous when I see that many external links coming from a new editor working on a commercial product. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unreferenced spam. Nothing found at Google News Archive or Google Scholar. I oppose a redirect because that would give this non-notable company an undeserved permanent link here at Wikipedia. --MelanieN (talk) 23:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The article Adverse Event Reporting System doesn't mention the word Reportum one speck. Maybe the contents of the article Reportum should be moved to Adverse Event Reporting System and Adverse Event Reporting System should give a hyperlink to the reportum website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackbombchu (talk • contribs) 04:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.