Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remedy Flashboards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:41, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remedy Flashboards

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT Clenpr (talk) 16:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rediect to Remedy Corp. —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could you provide at least a valid reference so we can keep it in the referenced page? Clenpr (talk) 06:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure we need a reference for a redirect, do we? I looked and found passing refs but nothing sufficient to establish notability which is why I’m recommending a redirect. —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 11:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia redirects should have a mention in the redirected page, but there is currently no mention as there are no references. Otherwise fake redirects could be created without such control. Clenpr (talk) 11:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is a logical redirect target, but without a mention at the target it's likely to confuse people in a future RfD. Do we have anything worth saying about it at this target?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:03, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Clenpr, the lack of any info beyond corporate documentation and raw sales data should make this extension of the similarly non-notable Action Request System ineligible for even a redirect to its parent company, Remedy Corp. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 14:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is completely lacking in context and only makes sense if read as part of Remedy Corporation. As both articles are so tiny they might as well be merged together. However the content is also unmergeable in its current form as it is unsourced, and I'm not finding good references to source it with. That leaves only Delete. Dorsetonian (talk) 18:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing mergeable here. I can see why it was deprodded, based on the activity, but - on the other hand - this is one that could probably have just been left for soft deletion. There is no independent article here. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.