Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinaldo Zavarce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reinaldo Zavarce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP, and I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish the subject's notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment A Find sources using a different set of paramaters seems to show many non-English sources. Time to seek input from Venezualan Wikipedians. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, sounds good, thanks! --Nuujinn (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak~~ keep es:Reinaldo Zavarce is supported by what appear to be multiple reliable sources providing decent coverage.VernoWhitney (talk) 21:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a solid keep to me given MQS's work at translating the sources. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsourced BLP. PhilKnight (talk) 18:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine. I'll do the translations that have not yet been done and see to the sourcing for this Venezualan actor. I still believe that all it requires is a little work, and will do it since others have not... specially since thst seem to be THE concern. I'll report back in a few hours. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Zavarce has sourcable notability in Latin America for his works for RCTV International and more recently for his starring role in the notable Nickelodeon Latin America telenovela series Isa TKM and Isa TK+. While my own translating of the sources (found through the alternative Find sources I offered on the 18th ) is proceeding slowly, I believe I AM showing improvement was and is possible. The article is shaping up and is already far better than what was first sent to AFD. Closer, please note the work (still ongoing) of just the last few hours. Thank you. And to Spanish and Portugese-reading Wikipedians... any and all help would be appreciated. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - agree with VernoWhitney - this is now a solid keep following MQS adding sources. PhilKnight (talk) 13:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, my spanish isn't very good, the sources I can read appear to be passing mention in articles primarily about the works in which he appears. That being said, MichaelQSchmidt has done yeoman's work and made significant improvements and found a number of sources, so I think there's enough potential here to justify a keep. --Nuujinn (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.