Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RefTeX
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep /IAR. Extant sourcing says otherwise. Star Mississippi 00:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- RefTeX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Computing. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. Per the article's reference list, the topic has attracted in-depth coverage (totalling about 13 printed pages) in at least four independent reliable sources. —Psychonaut (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.