Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redshift (software)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 20:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Redshift (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find any reliable, secondary sources for the subject. Has had a notability tag since October 2014. StewdioMACK Talk page 13:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Here is one: [1] Samsara 09:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Weakkeep, though the article needs a trim. Also reviewed in Lifehacker, Linux Magazine. Not exactly peer-reviewed research papers but for a minor piece of Linux software that's reasonable coverage. Opabinia regalis (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Since I went to the effort of googling to find those reviews, I added them to the article and trimmed as WP:NOT for your software's README files. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Three RS, some nearly-RS (e.g. [2]) and a long list of blog posts in at least two languages show that this has garnered considerable attention. Samsara 10:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 08:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 08:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.