Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redd Stylez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redd Stylez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Part hoax (if he landed a part starring as himself in a movie, why are there no Google news archive hits on him?), part promotional, part non-notable. - Dank (push to talk) 17:14, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 17:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 17:16, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't call hoax, as imdb (yes, I know) lists him as a credit for the movies. But I see no notability elsewise either. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't rely on IMDB for debunking a possible hoax, as you note, it's not a reliable source. Drawn Some (talk) 22:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it could be a hoax, it shouldn't be an article. Unverifiable. Hipocrite (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing about this article makes any sense with regard to verifiability and looks to me like a hoax. The imdb entry can be discounted as anyone can send in info to be added and their (imdb's) checking systems are less than efficient. I believe it to be a combination of a hoax and vanity article. --WebHamster 12:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I don't think it's a hoax, as there are MP3 downloads available under this name on MP3.com, however, notability is clearly not established. لennavecia 19:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.